Here’s a good chuckle at SCO’s expense:

“If SCO thought threat-born licensing fees would provide a quick boost to the bottom line, it looks to have miscalculated. As fellow Fool Tom Taulli noted last month, SCO has tried to cast its lawsuits in apocalyptic terms. But with the entire computing world putting its money behind Linux, it appears that, for SCO, the apocalypse is now.” [The Motley Fool Jan 15]

Groklaw, already had a link to it by the time news reached my ears [Jan 15].

Enjoy.

More Threatening Letters From SCO :groklaw:

SCO invokes DMCA, Names Headers, Novell Steps In [slashdot.org]

SCO Sends DMCA Notices :groklaw:

SCO Gets More Desperate, Sends More Letters [slashdot.org]

SCO Explains GPL Strategy and SCO Director Bails :groklaw:

The GPL is a License, Not a Contract, Which is Why the Sky Isn’t Falling [Groklaw Dec 14]

Referenced from Viral GPL Misconceptions Elegantly Explained [Slashdot Dec 15]

SCO Will Give Customers a Discount To Drop Linux and Use Any Proprietary Software [Groklaw Nov 7]

SCO isn’t putting out press releases like it used to. Surely it wants you to know that it has cooked up yet another way to be loathsome to Linux.

Sometimes it’s better just to be quiet.

CLOSURE, BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY [ditherati 2003-11-20]

“I think it’d be good for all of us to get some closure. ISVs

(independent software vendors), end-users, customers—they all want this cleared up.”

SCO Group CEO Darl McBride, on how he’s united the tech

world in wishing he would just go away, News.com, 18 November 2003

SCO plans more Linux lawsuits [news.com]